top of page

'Maurice' by E. M. Forster

  • Reed
  • Apr 22
  • 3 min read

Updated: May 8

A quietly radical novel of gay awakening, Maurice finds tenderness in unexpected places and dares to imagine a love that doesn’t have to end in silence.

Author: E. M. Forster

Rating: A+

Vibe: An English gay love story of restraint, repression, and radical tenderness in a world that demands silence.

Quick Take: A daring, deeply personal novel that unfolds like a secret kept too long—Maurice doesn’t just hold up; it still hits hard.


I went into Maurice expecting heartbreak. A lonely ending. Some quiet tragedy to seal its place in the gay literary canon. What I didn’t expect was joy—tentative, defiant, and shockingly tender. That shift, late in the novel, turned everything on its head for me. And it made clear just how revolutionary this story still feels, more than a century after it was written.


The book starts quietly. You meet Maurice Hall as a boy, watch him come of age in Edwardian England, and sense—long before he does—that something inside him doesn’t quite fit the world around him. He tries to follow the path laid out for him, hoping it’ll shape him into the kind of man he’s supposed to be. Straight. Settled. Safe. But what Forster captures so brilliantly is just how exhausting that performance is, and how much it costs to finally stop pretending.


Before we talk more about the novel, it’s worth stepping back. E.M. Forster was already a celebrated author when he wrote Maurice in 1913–14, known for A Room with a View, Howards End, and A Passage to India. But this book—the one closest to his heart—stayed unpublished until after his death in 1971. It’s no wonder he held it back. Maurice tells a story that, at the time, would’ve been considered radical—two men finding love without being punished for it. That choice makes the novel’s quiet hope all the more radical—and all the more personal.


Maurice as a character felt both frustrating and deeply familiar. His longing to be straight, to follow the path of social approval and religious comfort, hit especially hard for me. I remember thinking something similar once: that if I just followed the rules—served the mission, prayed the prayers—God would fix me. Maurice tries to will himself into heterosexuality. He studies it. Performs it. But like so many of us, what he really needed was permission to stop performing at all.


Forster doesn’t moralize, and that’s what makes the story powerful. He simply shows how hard it is to want what you’re told you can’t have—and how miraculous it is to finally reach for it anyway.


There’s one scene I keep thinking about, where Maurice takes a risk and sneaks back to see someone who mattered more than he was supposed to. The moment is quiet, but the emotional stakes are enormous. And it’s handled with such care. That choice—for connection, for love, for truth—is the emotional heartbeat of the novel.


What struck me most is how immediate it feels. You don’t read Maurice and feel like you’re wading through Edwardian formality—you feel like someone’s letting you in on a private truth. Forster’s style is clean, precise, and deeply human. The social context may be distant, but the emotional stakes haven’t aged a day. The secrecy, the longing, the desperate hope that something “straight” might fix you—it’s all still recognizable. Especially for those of us who grew up with faith traditions that treated gayness as a problem to be solved.


And then there’s Alec. I won’t say much, because I want you to meet him in your own time, but his voice was a balm: direct, grounded, and utterly unlike anyone else in Maurice’s life. The book shifts when he arrives, and so did I.


Maurice is romantic, yes—but also political in its quiet insistence on happiness. It’s historic, too, not just in when it was written, but in how boldly it imagines a different future. It’s a novel that could’ve ended in sorrow. Forster wrote it in a time when most gay stories did. But he chose joy.


And I’m so glad he did.


bottom of page